If your grade depended upon a person ONLY reading your best blog entries — writing style, details, analysis, language, editing, depth — which TWO weekly blog entries would you pick?
- Name of speaker, Name of Talk, Link to your blog entry, 2+ sentence why it is a successful piece of writing by you
- Name of speaker, Name of Talk, Link to your blog entry, 2+ sentence why it is a successful piece of writing by you
Likewise, if you could delete ONE of your weekly blog entries for any reason — writing style, details, analysis, language, editing, depth — which would it be?
- Name of speaker, Name of Talk, Link to your blog entry, 2+ sentence why it was NOT a successful piece of writing by you
Leave your response in a comment and hit ‘publish’.
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
The TED talks I liked the most were the ones that had personality to them. If the speaker didn’t have good stage presence, I would lose focus in the video and start doing something else.
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful:
Least Successful:
Two Best TED Talk Responses
Worst Response
I feel that my two best ted talks were my reflections on Anupam Mishra’s the ancient ingenuity of water harvesting and Erin McKean’s redefining the dictionary. Partly I feel that it was because both of these topics were interesting to me personally that my reflections on them were the most engaging.
I think my least successful post was John Gerzema on the post consumer crisis
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most Successful:
Least successful:
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
I have already mentioned that my first eight TED choices were not necessarily my best options since I was a bit hasty in picking them. I do feel that I made better selections with my extra credit reflections and therefore had more success in my writing.
Most successful writings:
Least successful writing
Most Successful Writing:
Least Successful Writing:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most Successful
Least successful
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful
Least Successful
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful:
Least Successful:
In order to have a successful response to a TED video, I believe we, as students, needed to have two things. We needed to have a good speaker who interested us but we also needed to have a strong opinion, whether it be in agreement with the speaker or disagreement with the talk.
Most successful:
Least Successful:
I feel that my two most successful blogs were Elizabeth Pisani’s -Sex, Drugs, and HIV–let’s get rational and Karen Armstrongs TED prize wish-charter for compassion.
I feel my Sex, Drugs, and HIV blog https://tedxproject.wordpress.com/2010/04/12/elizabeth-pisani-drugs-sex-and-aids…lets-get-rational/ was successful because it displayed my capability of being able to take a topic that I have absolultly nothing in common with and appearing as if I was an expert. I also enjoyed the process of writing this blog because it was challenging yet fulfilling in the end.
Ms. Karen Armstrongs charter for compassion video https://tedxproject.wordpress.com/2010/05/20/karen-armstrong-ted-prize-wish-the-charter-for-compassion/ was one that has the capability of making a large impact on any viewer regardless of religion. During the process of writing this blog, I felt the pressure to own up to the exceptionally high criterion that Ms. Armstrong set for any who tried to touch the topic. Although I was no where close to her standards, I still feel that some of my best writing went into this blog.
My least successful blog was on the Lose your ego find your compassion video: Even though this video is very closely related to Ms.Armstrongs topic, I still found it very difficult to write about. I’m not sure if it was how the information was given, but I just could not ‘get’ this video. Thus making my blog about https://tedxproject.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/imam-faisal-abdul-rauf-lose-your-ego-find-your-compassion/ it very unattractive.
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most Successful!
Least Successful
Most successful-
Least Successful-
Most successful
Least successful
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful
Least successful
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most Successful TED Talk:
Least Successful TED Talk:
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful:
Least Successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most Successful:
Least Successful:
The one I want deleted:
pt 2:
Most Successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Even though I can’t recall a time when I possessed what is referred to as self-confidence (much less an ego), I’d surmise that my writing for the TEDx Project was quite successful on the whole. By attempting to focus less on summarizing the content of the videos (really, if a twenty minute presentation is too much for a reader to stomach, the dense forest that is my writing would have them leaping out the nearest window anyway) and more on analyzing/responding to the speaker’s ideas and proposals, I achieved undeniably interesting results. Some were good…some were less so, but all were notable in some fashion or another.
Since I’ve never been the biggest proponent of masochism, I’ll first acknowledge the one I think worked the best: my first write-up where I analyzed a TED Talk by the atheistic biologist Richard Dawkins. It wasn’t the quality of the writing that made this one the “most successful”; for better or for worse, I think that remained largely consistent throughout the project. Rather, I’d say the writing clicked because I flat-out disagreed with the talk’s core thesis of militant atheism, which lead to a level of intrigue and friction not found in write-ups of the sycophantic variety. Further, the context made things even more interesting: as both an atheist and someone with immense respect for Richard as a scientist, there was a level of disappointment and disillusion in my writing, and I think it worked in the piece’s favor considerably.
Now that my back has been sufficiently patted, it’s time to delve into the worst of the bunch; though my answer might be a bit of a cop-out, as I don’t think the reason this submission wasn’t successful was entirely my fault. I’m referring to my write-up on a little video called “The Jill and Julia Show”, where a singer and social critic performed a charming duet poking fun at (for the time) topical issues. There was nothing particularly wrong with the video…save for the fact that I was forced to analyze what ultimately amounted to a piece of fluff designed to give the TED attendees a sigh of relief. As a result, I spent less time analyzing the video and more energy defending it against the boiling cauldron that is an internet comment section, where people were crying for it to be removed from the website. There just wasn’t much to talk about, and by God did it show in my writing.
That being said, I don’t think that any of my write-ups were categorically “bad.” I think the project was certainly successful overall, and I wouldn’t mind engaging in something similar in the future.
Link to Most: https://tedxproject.wordpress.com/2010/04/11/richard-dawkins-militant-atheism/
Link to Least: https://tedxproject.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/jill-sobule-and-julia-sweeney-the-jill-and-julia-show/
Most successful:
Least Successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
1) Two most successful
Least successful
My three favorites:
My least favorite:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most Successful:
Not So Successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Most successful:
Least successful:
Links:
Most successful:
Least successful: